What's been India's biggest selection blunder of the year?

Have your say on what Virat Kohli and Ravi Shastri have done wrong on India’s away series in 2018

ESPNcricinfo staff24-Dec-2018On their tours of South Africa, England and Australia in 2018, India have made several debatable selections in their playing XIs. Virat Kohli, the captain, and Ravi Shastri, the coach, have tried to pick sides for specific conditions and have given importance to recent form over reputation, but their choices have not always paid off. Which of these decisions do you think was the biggest mistake?So…

Off-field distractions have created uncertainty – Chandika Hathurusingha

The Sri Lanka coach explains how one setback after another has put an inexperienced side in turmoil

Interview by Andrew Fidel Fernando12-Feb-2019Sri Lanka have arrived in South Africa in substantial turmoil. Not only have they not won a match since October, the administration and selectors are on poor terms with coach Chandika Hathurusingha, regular Test captain Dinesh Chandimal has been jettisoned for the series, while a very inexperienced squad has been named. Coach Hathurusingha talks to ESPNcricinfo about the challenges he and his team face.The team has not won a match since October. How has that affected the dressing room?It has put a lot of strain on everyone. We were a bit unlucky, in a sense, during the England series. We could have have won at least two of the Tests. So many unforeseen things happened against us that we never expected. We knew Rangana Herath was going to retire, but Akila Dananjaya being called for a suspect action, and a lot of other little things didn’t go our way. We also have to take the blame. We didn’t field well, and we dropped vital catches.In New Zealand, I thought we fought very well in the first game. In the second match we bowled really well and in one session, the sheer skill of Trent Boult took the game away from us.Going to Australia, playing the pink ball is very challenging for any team – not only for Sri Lanka. Then in Canberra, we had so many unfortunate injuries. We were very depleted there. Those are the reasons. All in all, we’re disappointed.You’ve been in the job for 13 months now. Were you expecting to have had a bit more of an impact by this stage in terms of results?Actually, there has been improvement from 2017 to 2018, when you look at the stats. It was an 18-20% improvement. I wasn’t expecting us to win everything, but I was at least expecting us to win at home in Test cricket. In one-day cricket, we were always planning for the World Cup. Winning was part of it, but it wasn’t the main thing, actually. When I started, my presentations to the board were about giving players a certain number of games by the time the World Cup comes. I wanted players who we had identified to have played at least 15-18 matches out of the 20-odd matches we had left.In Tests, certain batsmen stood up in New Zealand, but as a unit they haven’t been strong over the last few games. What was the cause of those failures?I thought in New Zealand the batters did reasonably well. In the second game they weren’t up to the mark, but they fought. I agree that as a group we didn’t bat well. Conditions and the opposition were not easy for us. Playing pink-ball Tests at the Gabba is not easy. If you look around the world, most pink-ball Tests last only three days. If someone expects us to win in Australia is really unrealistic at this stage, because when we had some of the best players in the world – the Sangakkaras, Muralis and Rangana Heraths – we didn’t do it. With all these distractions as well, it’s unrealistic to expect us to win.Let’s talk about those distractions. There’s match-fixing allegations on one side, the Sports Ministry and the board making moves on one side, and then social media squabbles on another front. Is this all having an effect on the team?I think so. We’re all humans. The ICC fixing allegations had an impact. Then at the end of November, the selectors changed. And when the selectors changed, the leadership changed. There was a change of coaching staff as well. And that created uncertainty, and the continuity changed. Everything happened in public. And then what happened to the players? There’s enough pressure on the players in the middle for them to concentrate on. Suddenly the players have nowhere to turn. They don’t know whom to trust or whose instructions to take. It’s human nature to just start looking after your own interests in that kind of environment.It sounds like you’re saying all of this has led to players not playing for the team as much as they could be…I’m not saying they’re not playing for the team. But human nature is such that when uncertainty comes, you don’t know what to do. There’s no direction. We can’t plan. We can’t give them challenges. They can’t think about what they need to do. It’s not that they don’t want to play for the team. They are trying. But in any high-performance environment, successful teams have direction, strong leadership and continuity.What have you done to try and shield them from some of those distractions?I’m trying to give them confidence and direction as much as possible, to try and execute our gameplan.Sri Lanka coach Chandika Hathurusingha speaks on the phone during a training session•Getty ImagesDo you feel you have a role beyond the coaching and cricket side of things with the way the team is now?I think if I’m responsible for the outcome of matches, I have to do a much bigger role than this. If you look at the record, we were steadily improving. We were steadily establishing trust. We were establishing continuity, and the way we wanted to play. If you look solely at winning or losing, there are a lot of other things we can talk about. But if you look at my first six to eight months, there was a plan we were working towards.You feel that it’s been thrown into chaos in recent months?That’s a hard question. The answer is there. Do I have to say yes?What does the team have to do in this coming series now?Given the resources I’ve been given, I’ll try to do the maximum I can. I can’t give a prediction. Realistically, if the players are good enough to play here and compete, that’s what we’re looking to do. Our three frontline bowlers who would have played a role here in these conditions are injured. A few changes happened from the last three Test matches to here. We are very green.You’ve just been removed as an on-tour selector, and it’s clear that those higher up at the board aren’t especially happy with you. Do you feel you had a role in those relationships breaking down?It’s beyond my control. The board entrusted me with the selector-on-tour duties. That’s been taken away – they must have a reason. They way it was taken away is a bit questionable. It happened in the middle of a series. My disappointment is the way that happened – without much communication. That’s the question I have. At this stage I haven’t got any answers.Were you shocked at Dinesh Chandimal’s exclusion for the series?Yes, because I had no communication prior to that. I didn’t know that until I came to board the plane. In a tour like this, we need experience. It’s a vital thing in conditions like this. When Australia and South Africa come to the subcontinent, it’s the same thing. If you haven’t played here before, you struggle. Having played here before gives you a head start.You’ve got a lot of young players. Who are you really relying on in this series?I’m relying on the players who have been with us. Dimuth Karunaratne is the captain, so he has to lead from the front. He’s one of the best batters with Kusal Mendis. Him, Mendis and Niroshan Dickwella, who is in good form, have to stand up. Lahiru Thirimanne who has come back into the team, has a lot of experience. He has played since 2011 onwards. I think we have to rely on experience on this tour. Those guys have to to step up.

Aaron Finch-Marcus Harris union a Boxing Day gift for Victoria

For the first time in 45 years, the MCG will witness two Victorian batsmen walking out as openers – a mark of the state’s evolution from a successful system that wins trophies to one that has created an effective pathway for national cricketers

Daniel Brettig in Melbourne24-Dec-2018For all the uncharted territory navigated by Australian cricket in 2018, there will be a sense of loss and gain about Boxing Day in a way very relevant to the state that hosts the MCG. For the first Melbourne Test that will be lacking the commentary of Bill Lawry in 40 years will also be the first time two Victorian batsmen have walked out as openers in 45.While Aaron Finch and Marcus Harris have contrasting stories, techniques and top hands, their arrival together to begin Australia’s first innings will reflect the recent evolution of Victoria from a successful state system to one that is also churning out players chosen for the national team. No fewer than five players – Finch, Harris, Peter Handscomb, Peter Siddle and Chris Tremain – were part of the initial Australian squad for this series.Not since December 1973, when Keith Stackpole and Paul Sheahan put on 75 on day one of a victory over New Zealand, has Victoria provided two men at the top of the order in Melbourne, a drought that has summed up the often sporadic contribution the state has made to the national team amid unrivalled competition for talent, from Australian Rules football in particular. Lawry, of course, had been a fixture in the opening spot for most of the previous decade, often walking out to bat with the pugnacious Stackpole, or the more obdurate Ian Redpath.ALSO READ: MCG pitch under scrutiny ahead of Boxing Day TestSince then, only Matthew Elliott among Victorians has opened the batting for Australia for any length of time, his one and only Boxing Day ending with a pair of low scores against South Africa in 1997. Over the same period, the Victorian cricket public has been known for a sense of injustice about players who, in their view, were discarded too early [Dean Jones] or never given the sort of run offered to others [Brad Hodge].At the same time, other states have been known to quibble at how the nation’s second most populous state slipped behind Western Australia, and then Queensland, as a greenhouse for batting talent. They did so even as they envied, and even feared, the construction of a tight, combative, and broadly successful Victorian state system from about the time the late John Scholes became coach towards the end of the 1990s. Followed as coach by David Hookes, Greg Shipperd, David Saker, and now Andrew McDonald, Scholes ended a period of politicking and division in the state that had seen the Shield-winning team of 1990-91 spin off far fewer major international careers than expected.By the time a teenaged Harris first faced Victoria as a West Australian stripling in 2011, the team then known as the Bushrangers were known for abrasiveness but also unity. “When we played against Victoria, as a WA person it’s the team where you go, ‘I hate playing against them, they really get stuck into you, they’re the hardest team to play against’, and everyone’s in awe of them a little bit, almost to the point where people are scared of them,” he told ESPNcricinfo.”Victoria in a cricket sense would bully teams, and the opportunity to play with them and be a part of that was sort of like, ‘if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em’. The group they had at the time when I got offered to come over was a pretty senior group and it sorted where I was in my career and something I wanted to be a part of.”

“I’ve found in the two-and-a-bit years of being here I’ve learned so much about my game. Not so much through … yes, I’ve had good coaches, but more from playing with experienced guys, watching how they go about it, how they play, how they train and that’s what’s been beneficial to me.Marcus Harris

Asked to nominate his chief antagonists, Harris reeled off a considerable list, led predictably by Matthew Wade. “I used to hate playing against Wadey, then I found as soon as I came to Victoria, he was the bloke I got along with just about the best,” he said. “Finchy used to always give it to you, Pete Handscomb used to give it to you, but I found that when you play for Victoria, they don’t go out of their way [to get at you], they don’t talk about it in the pre-match, that’s just the way they are, and it’s sort of addictive.”I think you see with the Vics when we get on a roll in a series or a tournament, it’s like a juggernaut, you have this whole team coming at you and you feel really under the pump as an opposition team, so I’ve fed off that a little bit. By no means am I as vocal as any of those guys, but it is just how Victorians play and I really love it.”ALSO READ: Marcus Harris in Perth: the return of the prodigal sonEqually, however, Harris was able to find a way to work amongst the rest, finding that his youth, ability and yappy countenance were not only accepted but respected by the rest. An innings of 158 against Victoria in his final season with Western Australia played a large part in raising Harris’ attractiveness to the state, where coaches and selectors took delight in turning around the parting words of Justin Langer that “our system isn’t for everyone” by showing that in Victoria, all could indeed succeed.”I’ve found in the two-and-a-bit years of being here I’ve learned so much about my game,” Harris said. “Not so much through … yes, I’ve had good coaches, but more from playing with experienced guys, watching how they go about it, how they play, how they train and that’s what’s been beneficial to me.”To be around guys like Finchy and Whitey and Sidds [Siddle] and Patto [James Pattinson], you don’t even realise you’re learning at the time. It’s only when you look back and think ‘oh that’s what they were doing and now I’m starting to do that’. That’s probably the main thing. The coaches are there to help you and support you. Fortunately, I had Lachy Stevens there as well, who I had in WA, so I didn’t come into a completely foreign environment where I didn’t know anyone, and Lachy was very good for me to help me transition into that, and he’s a really good coach.”So I was lucky with that. The environment is just one of those good ones, where you know you have to do well and you have that sort of pressure on you, but it drives you to be successful. When you’re in a team that’s successful, I think you find a way to perform. It’s not easier to perform, but you have that drive within you.”Harris, of course, has been able to grow as a batsman and a team contributor in the intervening two-and-a-half seasons since his move. When he was heard tempting India’s wicketkeeper Rishabh Pant from short leg during the second Test by saying that if he got out in the fourth day’s final over, he could enjoy “a good circuit on a Monday night in Perth”, there could not only be seen local knowledge from his youth, but also the search for competitive edge reflected by his adopted state.”That was just me being a smart a*** really, but we had a good chat during the Test about being respectful but still having a crack and being an Aussie and not giving as good as you get, but still getting stuck in and doing it respectfully,” Harris said. “There’s definitely room for a bit of chat or banter, if that’s what people want to call it.”Do anything to try to get them off their guard a little bit. If they understand what I’m saying, it might work, but there’s probably every chance they’re not. But that’s all part of cricket, and sometimes, it can help in them losing their focus for long enough to maybe get them out.”Cricket Australia/Getty ImagesAs for Finch, his far longer road to a Test cap has been punctuated by plenty of wrong turns and false starts, but the concerted shift of Victoria from a state principally concerned with winning trophies to one that has mastered both the talent pathway and competition-driven elements of the domestic system has had plenty of benefit for the 32-year-old from the southwestern regional town of Colac.”Graffy’s less grumpy than he was when I first started!” Finch joked of the longtime Victoria cricket manager Shaun Graf when asked what had changed in the state. “The Junction’s an amazing project and something that was in the pipeline for so long. It’s just a fantastic place to be, such a learning environment. In days gone by, the competitiveness of the Vics, the accountability everyone’s held each other to has made everyone stronger, and I think there’s no better way than measuring the Shields to see that.”It’s a great reward for Victorian cricket being so strong over the last few years. The amount of Shields we’ve won over the past 10-12 years has been amazing and just reward in these selections. Marcus Harris has been banging down the door for a couple of years now since he made the move from WA, Pete Handscomb’s been a dominant run-scorer in international cricket when he’s played in the past.”Sidds has been a world-class performer for years now, and Trem [Chris Tremain] as well – 50 wickets every year – it’s a pretty extraordinary record he’s had in Shield cricket, Jonny Holland in Dubai and Abu Dhabi. Victorian cricket’s been in a really good space for the last couple of years, and I think a lot of that is down to a great pathway and management of players as well, with Graffy and Andrew Lynch, Andrew McDonald, Shippy, David Saker. Everyone’s played a huge part in the development of a lot of players, and I think the rewards at Australian level are just starting to come through.”Having set that early platform at the MCG 45 years ago, Stackpole and Sheahan only played one more Test together, the latter’s last, as the national selectors began to look elsewhere for top order batting options. Finch and Harris will hope they have more Boxing Days to share, but even if they don’t, the state that supports them is in the sort of shape to ensure it won’t be another 45 years before two Victorian openers walk out together onto the MCG.

Women's games during IPL 2019: what's the best way forward?

Jhulan Goswami, Lisa Sthalekar, Mel Jones and Tushar Arothe share their ideas

Annesha Ghosh19-Feb-2019

How many teams should be in action?

Jhulan Goswami (India ODI player): There are enough domestic players for four or five teams because in the Elite Group itself [in the inter-state domestic tournaments], every team has three-four good players. And four-five teams will also let you include more domestic players because at the end of the day, the objective is to strengthen Indian women’s cricket at the grass-roots level, right? To include more girls to take up cricket professionally. So unless there’s a big motivation ahead of them, I don’t see them taking that route.Why not check with the IPL franchises if they are willing to start a women’s team of their own. If four teams are willing, we should be starting a women’s IPL with four teams, and involve the best foreign players and our local and international Indian cricketers.Lisa Sthalekar (Former Australia captain, broadcaster): If they are going to keep it to two teams, then I’ll play a series of three-to-five matches and make the squad as big as you want, and expose the young Indian domestic players to international stars.The aim should be to align it with the IPL franchises somehow, and you’ve got to make the franchises buy into it, so the stadiums have the same colour, same vibe. One of the reasons why BBL-WBBL have been successful is because whatever you see on TV is what you see on the ground. The dressing up of the game is the same, and that’s great from a fan-engagement point of view because there’s nothing different between how the two leagues are carried out.Tushar Arothe (Former India women head coach): I am okay with having two quality teams or even three because I think there are good spinners and wicketkeepers in the domestic circuit to start off with three teams, but not enough for a full-fledged six- or eight-team league. I would love to see more Smritis, Harmans, Jhulans and Mithalis in the Indian team, and that can happen when you have more girls playing cricket, for which these exhibition games are going to be very important.Mel Jones (Former Australia player, broadcaster): The first year, if it has to take place in the heat of the day in Mumbai with the IPL going on, getting that kind of traction may not be easy. Having a couple of teams can help focus on what can really help the women’s game grow. Or, if you have three teams, and split the current Indian squad into three sides and have some of the next-best young guns and probably a couple more senior players outside of the squad as well.

The only other way you could have double-headers is if you have weekend games, where the men can play the 4 o’clock game, while the women’s game can start at 7pm, as it happened in the 2010 World T20 finalLISA STHALEKAR

When WBBL started, because they had five years of Big Bash behind it, there was a clear structure path Cricket Australia followed, with the Women in Cricket strategy. Until the BCCI have a similar idea about where they want to take women’s domestic cricket in India, perhaps they may be looking to create an okay product so that the best of women’s cricket is put up on display.

How many overseas players should each team have?

Goswami: Having four-five overseas players means you can accommodate more uncapped players alongside the current India players.Sthalekar: Instead of cutting it up the same way as the men’s IPL, the women’s teams in these exhibition games could have a couple more overseas players, to ensure it is more competitive and exciting, it could be flexible. Five players in a two-team structure.Arothe: I’d say five is good as it was last year.Jones: Four overseas players in each squad, if you have three teams, but doesn’t mean all have to play in the XI in each game.

Where should the matches be played?

Jones: I think there’s great potential to build a connection with the local community. A lot of it might be about putting out an expression of interest; to place it out there and see who really wants it. I wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of cities go, “This would be fantastic to have.” Then you start to build long-term relationships with these cities.Goswami: Take these games out of the metros and try to connect with the smaller towns. If we are playing in stadiums with 30,000 capacity, you’ll barely be able to make it appear full. They better take the games to state associations which do not have IPL teams at the moment, like Vadodara, Lucknow, Vizag and Ranchi, to name a few.Arothe: Ideally, it should be organised in two-three legs if there are three teams. Say, you take the eight league games to two cities – big or small – and the final elsewhere, over a period of two weeks. That will give your uncapped players substantial time to learn and interact with the foreign players or even those in the current Indian squad. But ensuring the smaller cities are given as much or more preference as Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata, etc will play a big part in how these games are received.Smriti Mandhana and Suzie Bates have a chat during training•Annesha Ghosh

When to play – afternoon or evening?

Jones: If you’re trying to get the regular IPL-watchers to follow these games, you’ll have to keep their mindset in mind – they’re all working in the day on weekdays – and do evening games. If you want to model it after the WBBL, their whole marketing campaign is about family, that means weekend games, family-friendly time, and engaging local schools. So there’s good opportunity to look at it as something to drive women’s empowerment or inspiring the next generation of boys and girls in India.Goswami: If there are 2pm starts in April-May summer like last year’s game, I won’t expect too many people to come in. Either do it on the weekends with 5pm starts, or host them on IPL match eve.

Double-headers: yay or nay?

Goswami: I don’t think double-headers are or will be encouraged in our country anytime soon.Sthalekar: To have double-headers in the afternoon, in that time of the year, it’s not nice to be out and watching cricket. The only other way you could have double-headers is if you have weekend games, where the men can play the 4 o’clock game, while the women’s game can start at 7pm, as it happened in the 2010 World T20 final. What happens is the crowd in the stadium is already there. In the WBBL, too, there was a game in Perth where women played after the men, and there were 17,000 of the 30,000 people from the men’s game watching the women’s.

How should the games be promoted?

Goswami: Bring in Bollywood and regional movie stars, famous ex-cricketers, just like the IPL did when it started. Hyderabad had involved their local stars, and Shah Rukh Khan, Juhi Chawla, Preity Zinta, Shilpa Shetty, Akshay Kumar were all there. Why not try to do the same?Jones: When you have a Virat Kohli, Shikhar Dhawan, MS Dhoni introduce these players as such and such or the teams, people will automatically want to know more about them and start following these games. So you’re in a way piggybacking on the association to give the competition a leg-up.Arothe: Last year, so many came to watch the India-Australia ODIs because there was a separate event management company that had been employed to publicise these games. Do you remember how many hoardings were put up across the streets? And there were results for everyone to see.Sthalekar: If you buy a ticket for a men’s IPL game, it should certainly have a mention of the women’s game – whether it’s before or after – like in a concert. The supporting act is always mentioned. We should all be educated on what’s happening on that day.

Mitchell Santner – the X-factor is in his instinct and his bravery

You might underestimate the left-arm spinner, but New Zealand don’t; he creates pressure at one end so his mates can strike from the other

Alagappan Muthu12-Jun-2019It is the 43rd over. Bangladesh’s finisher is at the crease. Mahmudullah has been biding his time. He’s only 20 off 40 but he’s now itching to go.Mitchell Santner comes on. A flag bearer for fingerspin in limited-overs cricket. He sees the batsman making room and, in the split second between load up and release, decides to slow his pace down and shift his line well outside off.Mahmudullah ends up having to reach for the ball – losing his balance and, as a result, his power – and spoons it to cover. Kane Williamson is there, taking a catch so simple it makes the cricket look silly.The New Zealand captain rarely shows any emotion on the field. In the 2015 World Cup, he hit Pat Cummins for a straight six to conjure a one-wicket win. Forty thousand people were going mad at Eden Park. But the most he could muster was one fist pump. In slow motion. Here, he looks Santner square in the eye and starts clapping.There’s a way to go yet, but he’s getting there•ESPNcricinfo LtdLater that same night, our hero unfurls the picture perfect cover drive and seals a victory almost as nerve-wracking as Auckland four years ago. He then starts to walk back to the dressing room but feels a little push on his back. It’s his batting partner Lockie Ferguson basically saying without saying, “What are you doing, you idiot. Get in that spotlight and lead us off the park.”ALSO READ: Why does Trent Boult not get his due when we talk about the world’s best bowlersThe world may underestimate Santner. He’s No. 26 on the ODI bowler’s rankings. But New Zealand don’t. He’s the first spinner on their team sheet. He gives them ten overs most times and, somehow, despite small grounds and flat pitches, finds ways to contain batsmen.It’s his one job and it’s crucial because it makes up for a weakness.New Zealand’s batting – especially their finishing – is wobbly. They can’t always make and chase 350. So they rely on the bowlers to set them up with softer targets. They are like Pakistan in that way. That’s why there are three slips when Trent Boult runs in with that glossy new ball. That’s why Santner’s economy rate – 4.87 – is valued above his strike rate – 42.2. He creates pressure at one end so his mates can strike from the other.A lot of things come together to make Santner produce such numbers. His instinct – telling him when to toss the ball up and when to slide it through; his use of angles – going around the wicket to left-handers so even though the ball turns into them, the angle would test the outside edge; his bravery – he usually takes the pace off when people are trying to hit him for six.ESPNcricinfo LtdSimon Doull, on commentary, highlighted that point in the game against Bangladesh. And the reason it is important is because modern-day batsmen are used to spin bowlers going quicker and flatter when under pressure. So they set up expecting Santner to do the same. But he seems to be aware that by slowing it down, he can make them lose their shape and mistime their shots. The stats bear that out too. Only Mohammad Nabi (700) and Rashid Khan (714) have conceded fewer runs in boundaries than he (884) has.Now, full disclosure. That list comes with a pretty big rider – minimum 50 innings bowled since June 9, 2015 – and is therefore only 14 strong. But that too is a sign. It shows that, from the day he made his debut, Santner has been among the most trusted players in 50-over cricket. After all, no captain throws the ball that many times to someone unless they know they will deliver.Let that sink in for a bit. New Zealand have placed utmost belief in fingerspin even though all of us have moved on to wristspin. It’s like going to an ice-cream shop and ordering double chocolate fudge despite there being a sale on the hipster flavours. And it’s worked. Take a look at the batsmen Santner’s gone up against, and kept quiet.

That’s two GOATs… Enough hard-hitters from the two countries tipped to win this World Cup… Hell, he’s even kept a lid on the very best left-handers. With all that in mind, is it any wonder that the original left-arm-spinning Black Cap Boy Wonder is raving?”Mitch Santner was the most impressive,” Daniel Vettori wrote in his ICC column after the Bangladesh game. “It shows how much he has come on that New Zealand felt they could use him late on, in overs 40-50, he has so much control now and is both a defensive and attacking spin bowler. He went for one four and one six in the whole innings and was a really key part of that attack.”Mitch has been exceptionally unfortunate with injuries but now we’re seeing exactly why the selectors picked him from a young age. They saw the talent and he’s shown he has the ability, not just with the ball but in the field and with the bat too.”It’s remarkable that a 27-year-old slow left-armer, from a country that doesn’t have a spin culture, in a world thirsty for X-factor bowlers, has become so good. And the funny thing is, this is only the beginning.

Which top cricket city would win the World Cup?

Sydney, Delhi, Lahore or Christchurch – who has produced the best World Cup XIs?

Sadaqut Ullah Khan10-Aug-2019Some things never change. Like New Zealand qualifying for the World Cup semi-finals: they did so for a record eighth time in 2019. Like everything going wrong with the South African campaign and the team punching below its weight on the biggest stage of all.

Data and methodology

Information on players’ birthplaces was sourced from ESPNcricinfo and the websites of official cricket boards. If a player is born in a suburb that is generally considered a part of a metropolitan city, that player’s stats have been included in the rankings for that city. Information about city of birth could not be found for around 100 players but those were mostly from Associate nations like Canada, Bermuda, Netherlands and Scotland, so these omissions and/or mistakes will not make a real difference to the overall rankings.

And like Sydneysiders taking their team close to winning yet another World Cup. In England this year, David Warner and Steven Smith piled up the runs while Mitchell Starc and Pat Cummins took wickets like machines.Sydney has a history of producing players who rise to the occasion. Three of Australia’s four World Cup-winning captains – Allan Border, Steve Waugh and Michael Clarke – are from there, and there have been a lot of remarkable contributions from players like Mark Waugh, Jason Gillespie, Starc, Smith and Warner.An analysis of over 1850 players from 133 World Cup squads through the history of the tournament places Sydney on top of the list of cities with the best overall bowling and batting performances in World Cup history. It is the only city in the world that can field a complete team of World Cup winners. There are 15 players from Sydney who have been part of World Cup-winning squads.Take a look at the cities with the largest number of players who made it into World Cup squads.Sadaqut Ullah Khan/ESPNcricinfo LtdCities with the best batting talent
Colombo (8186) and Harare (6328) have the most World Cup runs but these were scored at an average of 29 and 26 respectively. That doesn’t speak too highly of the overall batting talent produced by these cities.Sadaqut Ullah Khan/ESPNcricinfo LtdWhen you apply a higher cut-off in terms of average, Sydney comes out on top. The city has produced several batsmen who can tough it out in the most difficult situations – like Steve Waugh, Clarke, Smith, Mark Waugh and Warner.Launceston in Tasmania is second, thanks to players like David Boon and Ricky Ponting – the latter is second on the list of the highest run scorers in World Cups. Cape Town is third; it has produced gritty batsmen like Jacques Kallis, Gary Kirsten, Jonathan Trott and Andy Flower.Then we have Delhi, where Virat Kohli, Virender Sehwag, Gautam Gambhir and Shikhar Dhawan come from.Cities with the best bowling talent
Sydney comes out on top again. Starc has played the most vital role here, with 49 World Cup wickets at an average of less than 15. Other notable performances include 16 wickets at 16.1 by Nathan Bracken and 19 wickets at 23 by Cummins. Gillespie, Steve Waugh and Border have also made some good contributions.Sadaqut Ullah Khan/ESPNcricinfo LtdChristchurch is second, with bowlers like Richard Hadlee, Shane Bond, Matt Henry, Chris Harris and Ben Stokes. Bond tops the list with 30 wickets at 17.1. Hadlee is next with 19 at 18.1, while Harris, Henry, Stokes and Andrew Caddick have also picked up a lot of wickets.At No. 3 is Kingston, for whom Michael Holding, Courtney Walsh, Andre Russell and Sheldon Cottrell are the leading contributors.Cities with the best average of Man-of-the-Match awards
Lahore has won the most Man-of-the-Match awards but that is simply because there are more top players from Lahore compared to any of the other cities. If you look at the averages, Dubbo in New South Wales, has the best average, because of Glenn McGrath. (Dubbo is about 300km away from the nearest big cities, Sydney and Newcastle, and so it has been considered as a city in its own right.)Sadaqut Ullah Khan/ESPNcricinfo LtdIn second place comes Chandigarh, with players like Kapil Dev and Yuvraj Singh, the main architects of India’s successes in the 1983 and 2011 World Cups. Launceston owes its third place to Ponting.Cities with the best chances of winning the World Cup
Stats of players from more than 450 cities were considered in this exercise, but it turns out only 31 cities have produced at least 11 players or more. So we looked at the best performances of players from these cities to see which one has the best overall talent to compete in the World Cup.Some of these cities are good in the batting department (like Delhi and Mumbai) but lack strength in their bowling. Then there are cities like Wellington and Port Elizabeth that have really good bowlers but not enough quality batsmen.The eight cities in the graphic below have the most balanced teams – with players who have performed reasonably well in World Cups.Sadaqut Ullah Khan/ESPNcricinfo LtdYou can see that Auckland, Christchurch, Cape Town and Johannesburg have a lot of big names but they don’t have the star-studded line-ups that Sydney and Lahore boast of. The two South African sides have players like Andrew Strauss, Graeme Smith and Jonathan Trott, whose ODI records were not as good as their Test ones. They also contain quality players who haven’t quite performed to their true potential in the World Cup, like Quinton de Kock, Vernon Philander and Kagiso Rabada.Together, Lahore and Sydney have more than 20 players who helped their teams reach and win a World Cup final. Most of these players were ranked among the best ODI bowlers or batsmen of their time. Which is why our final will be played between these two teams.Sadaqut Ullah Khan/ESPNcricinfo LtdLahore has a slight edge over Sydney in the final because of its bowling line-up – Wasim Akram, Imran Khan, Saqlain Mushtaq and Abdul Qadir. So good is their attack that Sarfaraz Nawaz, Wahab Riaz and Imran Tahir have been relegated to the bench.The batting line-up isn’t too shabby either: Mohammad Yousuf, Babar Azam, Saleem Malik, Umar and Kamran Akmal and Aamer Sohail. Not to forget that Imran, Abdul Razzaq and Akram are more than handy with the bat.You can argue that Sydney has batsmen like the Waughs, Smith, Warner and Clarke, who can deal with any bowling line-up, and that their pace attack is fearsome, with tall fast bowlers like Starc, Gillespie and Bracken. However, they don’t have any quality spinners or a proper wicketkeeper in their squad – so Warner will have to take the gloves.However, Lahore might be displaced from the top in a few years since the city isn’t routinely producing champions like Imran and Akram, while Sydney and Christchurch are still on top of the game.

Lack of domestic depth leads South Africa into uncertain times

South Africa have seen leaner times before, but on this occasion, there appears little room for immediate hope that things will change

Firdose Moonda13-Oct-2019The good news, or rather the mildly comforting news, is that it has been this bad for South African cricket before.They have lost Test series, of course, and they have even lost three in a short period of time, as is the case now, not so long ago. In 2004, after drawing in New Zealand, South Africa lost to Sri Lanka, India and England. In 2005 and 2006, they lost back-to-back series against Australia, beat New Zealand but lost to Sri Lanka.The bad news is that even when it looked really bad for South Africa then, there was always hope they would come good. Between 2004 and 2006, Graeme Smith was a youngish captain, still discovering his leadership style while the administration was trying to find the right fit in a coaching capacity.Though South Africa’s results may not have reflected it, they had world-class quality in their ranks with stalwart players like Shaun Pollock, Makhaya Ntini and Herschelle Gibbs still in good nick, Jacques Kallis and Mark Boucher establishing what would become dominance and talent bubbling in the background. Their up and coming players included Dale Steyn, Hashim Amla, AB de Villiers and Morne Morkel.Watch cricket on ESPN+

India v South Africa is available in the US on Hotstar and ESPN+. Subscribe to ESPN+ and tune in to the Ranchi Test.

Now, it’s different. Faf du Plessis is not young and has been captaining for three years, as long as Smith towards the end of that poor run. His most experienced team-mates only have as much experience as he does, like Vernon Philander and Dean Elgar, and while there are at least two names – Quinton de Kock and Kagiso Rabada – who are likely to form the senior core in years to come, there aren’t many exciting players lurking at the level below. Aiden Markram and Lungi Ngidi already have questions over form and fitness and while there’s peripheral interest in the likes of Sinethemba Qeshile and Janneman Malan, South Africa’s structures seem to be eroding underneath them. That’s where we must look to dissect the significance of the series loss in India.On the face of it, it’s problematic enough that South Africa have lost three of their last four Test series which includes home and away defeats to Sri Lanka. The nature of these losses only underlines the weakness they are perceived to have against the turning ball, in spin-friendly conditions and in the production of their own tweakers. It should lead to questions over whether their annual spin camp is worth the money they spend on it, especially as Cricket South Africa (CSA) navigates increasingly tough financial times.8:29

Agarkar: India’s call to play three seamers brilliant

Dig a little deeper and there are broader issues these series should highlight. The obvious one is the depth in South African cricket, which, for a country with a schools system that pumps out professional sportspeople at the rate India produces engineers, is scarily lacking. But why? The low-hanging fruit for this exercise are the varieties you already know: there’s been a Kolpak-exodus and a push towards transformation, which has forced franchise teams to be made up in a certain way (a minimum of three players of colour and three black African players need to be in each XI). There has also been the rise of T20 leagues, which has removed players from the system as they chase money abroad.Combined, it could be argued, these three things have stripped South Africa’s domestic scene of a level of experience that could ensure there is an organic learning process. It has meant the likes of de Villiers, even when he was still a nationally-contracted player, hardly ever played for the Titans, that a player such as Andrew Birch, an experienced seamer at the Warriors, sometimes can’t fit into the XI and it has taken someone like David Miller, who retired from first-class cricket at the start of last summer, away from the domestic scene. This is not an argument in favour of de Villiers or Birch or Miller, all white, keeping out talented, young players of colour; it is an argument that retaining them to some degree could raise the overall standard of the franchise game.South Africa’s four-day competition is unloved, unattended and goes by largely unnoticed but it is where Test cricketers are produced. The first round of this season’s fixtures took place this week, with several problems. What has in the past been a premier fixture between the Johannesburg-based Lions and Cape Town’s Cobras was played at the Lions’ second-tier home ground in Potchefstroom, where 39 wickets fell in two days. CSA is yet to comment on whether the conditions raised any concerns. This is one example; scroll back through the recent summers and you will find plenty of others. There have been matches finishing inside three days, underprepared pitches, and a general disregard for the standard of the game at that level. The national team is now reaping what has been sowed.When du Plessis laments the loss of experience, he is on one hand talking about what any team would go through if they faced a slew of retirements, but on the other of the unreadiness of franchise players to make the step up. By way of comparison, when du Plessis debuted, he scored a century. It took Theunis de Bruyn 11 innings to do the same and the way he is batting now, it may take many more before he reaches three figures again. Du Plessis has asked for patience but that won’t solve the bigger problem: that South Africa needs a surge of young talent to bang the door down and there’s nothing the current players can do about that.Instead, they need to ensure they fix what they can at their level so that they are prepared to bring in and nurture younger players. For that, du Plessis’ other request must be heard. “It’s important that as a senior player group, we put in performances ourselves. Myself, Dean Elgar, Quinton de Kock. We can’t expect other guys to. We need to make sure we put in the runs first and then expect the guys to chip in with us. At a time like this, it’s important that your big players really take control and make sure they put in the bulk of the work.”Some would say they already have. Elgar and de Kock scored centuries in Visakhapatnam and du Plessis has two fifties to his name. They just haven’t all performed together. Others would say they haven’t done enough. As Mayank Agarwal and Virat Kohli showed, hundreds need to become big hundreds, especially in the first innings in the subcontinent. Du Plessis knows that and it’s part of why he promoted himself to No. 4 in the second innings in Pune.Temba Bavuma drives straight back down the wicket•BCCI”I felt it was important for me to step up,” he said. “The batting failed in the first innings and every innings we’ve been in a position where we are 30 or 40 or 50 for 3. I was trying to find us a better start, trying to take responsibility in making sure I step up to the plate.”For the foreseeable future he could stay there. “Possibly moving forward, for now, that is something that needs to be considered for me to bat there until we feel that there is growth, and there are games behind batsmen’s names so that the experience can come back.”That will allow Temba Bavuma, who is being groomed as du Plessis’ successor, not just at No. 4 but also as captain, time to gain the experience that successful Test players need. South Africa don’t have the luxury of doing that for everyone. While Elgar can set an example for Markram, and Philander can guide some of the younger seamers, a batsman like de Bruyn simply has to bat at No. 3 or make room for Zubayr Hamza, leaving some of the inexperience unchecked. And so South Africa may have to get used to some level of inconsistency.For du Plessis, and doubtless for South African fans, there is an inherent frustration in that. It means, as we have seen in the two Tests in India so far, that South Africa are not always able to compete against their opposition, something du Plessis acknowledged was the case in Pune. “You don’t mind losing to a team that is better than you but this Test match we weren’t even close to where we needed to be to try and compete.”So how do South Africa get closer? That’s where the worse news comes in. Du Plessis doesn’t really know and there was an air of resignation to his comments. “There’s still fight but from a bowling, batting and fielding point view, there’s a lot of questions that need answers and players need to put their hands up. A series in India is tough but it’s a real character test and only you can find the answers for yourself,” he said.

In Shreyas Iyer, India finally have a No. 4 again

He walked in under pressure and walked out with his reputation enhanced

Alagappan Muthu24-Jan-2020Shreyas Iyer has threatened to play an innings like this for India for a long time; an innings where he seemed invincible.He had no business being that. He should have been very vincible. Out of place even. He had never played a T20I away from home before, let alone dealt with one where he was the last man standing against an opposition transformed.One of the first things he was subjected to after he walked out to bat in Auckland was the sight of his captain being dismissed. New Zealand claimed the wicket of Virat Kohli through a breathtaking catch in the outfield. Stuff like that can completely change the mindset of the fielding team.It gives them belief, the single most important thing when the pressure is on.But Iyer wouldn’t back down. Actually, he kept stepping the bad word up.Two balls after the Kohli dismissal, he backed away and sent a perfectly good length ball aimed at his stumps to the long-off boundary.It was just the perfect response because Eden Park is a place where boundaries are the only things that matter. Bowling teams go there trying to prevent them at all cost and batting teams play without any inhibition because they know even mishits can result in six runs.New Zealand had already benefited from such an approach, with even Kane Williamson happy to slog it around. He reached his fifty off 25 balls, quicker than Colin Munro, the designated dasher of the line-up. If a batsman whose best feature is how late he plays a cricket ball is happy to go out in search for it and manufacture shots that aren’t on, then he is doing it because he has no choice.Iyer knew this well. And even before he touched down in New Zealand, he had been advised to break the shackles.India were in the middle of a series decider against Australia this past week when he had walked out to bat. Most of the work had already been done in that game, but it still ain’t fun when Pat Cummins and Mitchell Starc are charging in straight at you.”I knew they were going to attack me on my body,” Iyer said. “They were trying to get on my head.”Kohli was at the other end in Bengaluru. “Shreyas came up and asked me, ‘Should I attack?’ I said yes because the pressure was off us. Because of the [good] position [we were in], I wanted it to be a part of his learning, to take on their best bowlers and his execution was outstanding.”Iyer actually went one better here. True, New Zealand did not have the same quality of bowlers, but they are among the very best in making the most of scoreboard pressure. The World Cup pretty much proved that and they were in the middle of an encore.India spent a period where they made only 22 runs in three overs. It was during this period that they lost both KL Rahul (56 off 27) and Kohli (45 off 32). The equation now read 75 off 48 balls – exactly the kind of situation that has got the better of this side. There was too much of the game still left and none of the top three were around to deal with it.There was a moment – a fleeting moment – when Iyer seemed affected by this. In the 16th over, he went really hard at a legbreak and lost all of his shape, but he had kept enough of his balance to avoid being stumped. Whatever happened between that ball and the next is where India won this game.Maybe Iyer slowed himself down. Maybe he closed his eyes, took in a breath, blocked out the noise and listened only to that voice in his head. Maybe it told him to calm down.The next ball from Sodhi was a tease. The kind Yuzvendra Chahal dishes out all the time. The wide legbreak. The one that a batsman panicking because of the required rate would try to slog into the leg side. Iyer hit that to the point boundary. He stood tall. He moved towards the ball – who does that in T20 cricket? – got his head on top of it and cut it well to the left of the fielder in the deep. It was beautiful.From there on, Iyer would not be stopped. He would even go on to make his opponents look utterly silly. To be fair, Eden Park has a hand in that as well.The only way anyone can keep the runs down there is by either targeting the body and by using slower balls. Tim Southee had already indulged in his variation at the start of the 17th over. Iyer the next one would be at his body. So as it was being sent down, he stepped across his stumps and suddenly the short ball meant to cramp him was, in effect, a short ball down the leg side. An expertly timed pull shot later, India had six more.Iyer was hyper aware of both his game and what the New Zealand bowlers were trying to do. In the next over, when Hamish Bennett started around the wicket, he knew the ball would be on leg stump. He that with a tiny step to his right he would have access to the long leg boundary again. That clever little leg glance was followed by an entirely orthodox flick past long-on.Iyer paced this chase in a manner that was truly incredible. Five of his eight boundaries came off either the first or the second ball of the over. He knew he had to find them otherwise he would never be able to put the pressure back on New Zealand; to make them doubt themselves even though they had the upper hand having dismissed India’s top three. And that is the biggest takeaway from this game. As big as the win itself.India finally have a No. 4 again.

Much-needed hundred gives Joe Root breathing space

Batsman’s longest ton quietens doubters, though ultimately resolves little

George Dobell in Hamilton01-Dec-2019The punch of the air and broad smile told the story: Joe Root needed this century.He had certainly been made to work hard for it. No hundred had taken him longer – 259 balls – and at one stage, he went more than 30 overs without a boundary. More than that, though, it had been eight months since his previous Test century. In the time since, his membership of the ‘big four’ had lapsed and questions about his future as captain had started to crop up with increasing and uncomfortable persistence.ALSO READ: Return to form ‘just round the corner’ insists RootLet’s be clear: had Root been dismissed for a pair in this match, he would still have led England in South Africa. If there were a viable alternative that might not be the case, but there isn’t. Not really. And he retains the confidence of his team.Joe Root drives through the covers•AFP / Getty ImagesBut there had been a creeping suspicion that the cost of retaining Root as captain was compromising his ability to perform his day job: scoring runs. And England, a team who have not scored 400 this year (and did so only once in 2018), cannot afford their best batsman to endure such a fallow spell. They are going to end a year without a Test series victory for the first time this century, after all (the last time they did so was in 1999)If you had any doubt about the importance of Root’s runs to England consider these statistics. Before this match, England had won 13 – and lost none – of the 16 matches in which Root has scored a century. And in a side in which only five men have scored a Test century – one of them bats at No. 9 and another at No. 11 – his contributions are magnified.So England needed this innings from Root. And this innings from Rory Burns. Not just to give them an outside chance to square this series against New Zealand, but to show they could adapt to conditions where patience and discipline are as important qualities as flair and aggression. To show they were making progress.But most of all they needed it to give Root some breathing space. This hundred, albeit one made on a docile surface, will quieten – at least for a while – the voices calling for change and, probably more importantly, quieten the doubts within Root’s own head. It was his first century in his team’s first innings since August 2017 while the partnership between Root and Burns (177) was England’s highest since Alastair Cook was in the side in September 2018. Clearly in some discomfort at times – he received treatment on his long-standing back injury at various intervals – it was, in its way, a brave and determined innings, too. Root is, once again, a captain leading from the front.Joe Root celebrates reaching his century•Getty ImagesThis innings was, in many ways, a model of denial. It was a reminder of the adage that batting is as much about the shots you don’t play as those you do. So the drive was, largely, put away – he has scored only 14 of his 114 to date in front of square on the off side, with his only boundary in the area taking him into the 90s – and, in waiting for the ball to come to him, picked off 69 runs from his legs and hips between fine leg to midwicket. 75 of his runs have come behind square on either side of the wicket and he hasn’t given a chance. It was probably fitting the century was achieved with an under-edge which scudded to the boundary. This wasn’t anywhere near his prettiest innings, but it has been important.Might it be compared to Andrew Strauss’ career-saving century at Napier in 2008? Michael Vaughan was still captain but Strauss was highly regarded for his character as much as his cricket. He was struggling to command a place in the side though and, when he came into bat on a pair in the second innings, there was a sense that he was out of chances. And we all know what he went on to achieve.Maybe there is nothing as dramatic at stake here. This innings doesn’t resolve anything, after all. It hasn’t even given England the upper hand in the game. But it has kept them in it and it has boosted Root’s authority as player and leader. It may yet prove to be a fresh start, too. In a game played as much in the mind as on the pitch, it will certainly help him travel to South Africa without some of the excess baggage that might have accompanied him.Regardless, England will struggle to win this game. Rain that curtailed the day by 16.2 overs may also have denied England of any realistic chances they may have had. With the pace of run-scoring so slow – a reflection of the pitch more than England’s caution – they cannot expect to reach parity until lunch at the earliest. And there’s some work ahead to achieve even that.That means they will have to bat on into the final session of day four, at least, to be able to consider the sort of declaration that could pressure on New Zealand. And, bearing in mind they took only nine wickets in the whole of the first Test, they will be asking a lot of themselves to claim 10 within three or so sessions. There is the prospect of more poor weather, too, though maybe the hints of irregular bounce that crept into play late in the day will prove some encouragement.Most of all, though, England will be encouraged by Root’s return to productivity. It doesn’t solve all their problems, by any means, but it does represent a significant step in the right direction.

Rangers backed to hire £6m Ferguson successor who can close gap to Celtic

Rangers will look to hire a title-winning manager whose record is “second to none”, according to a fresh claim from Derek Ferguson.

Rangers hurtling towards momentous manager decision

It is going to be another season without a Scottish Premiership title for the Gers, with Celtic’s dominance over them something that needs to be addressed this summer. Rangers have a massive decision to make when it comes to their next permanent boss, with Barry Ferguson doing a solid job in interim charge to date, keeping his side in the Europa League, as they prepare to take on Athletic Bilbao in the quarter-finals next week.

Barry Ferguson

There is a strong argument to say that a more proven manager needs to arrive at Ibrox before the start of next season, however, in order to give the Gers the best possible chance of getting their hands on the league title again, slowly returning to being the dominant force of Scottish football.

Plenty of names have been mentioned since the sacking of Philippe Clement, from Steven Gerrard to Kevin Muscat, but it’s another high-profile link dominating plenty of talk around Ibrox.

Benitez backed to be next Rangers manager

Speaking to Ibrox News, Ferguson talked up the idea of Rangers hiring Rafa Benitez as their next manager, saying he would help narrow the gap on Celtic.

“You look at his CV and it shows you he’s won plenty. Barry brings passion and everything Rangers supporters want, but at the end of the day, when you look at a CV, Benitez’s is second to none. You can’t ignore that. I’m like a lot of the supporters in being excited by results under Barry, but when there’s guys of the calibre of Benitez putting their name forward, I’m all for that. I just want Rangers to be back competing with Celtic. Guys of Benitez’s quality will only help with that.”

Rafa Benitez linked with West Ham job

Benitez has to be considered one of the strongest options out there to be Rangers’ next permanent boss, considering what a glittering managerial career he has enjoyed – he is also reportedly keen on taking the job.

The Spaniard won two La Liga titles with Valencia during his time in charge, getting the better of both Real Madrid and Barcelona, and he also famously won the Champions League with Liverpool back in 2005.

Real Madrid Castilla

1993-1995

Real Valladolid

1995-1996

Osasuna

1996

Extremadura

1997-1999

Tenerife

2000-2001

Valencia

2001-2004

Liverpool

2004-2010

Inter Milan

2010

Chelsea

2012-2013

Napoli

2013-2015

Real Madrid

2015-2016

Newcastle United

2016-2019

Dalian Professional

2019-2021

Everton

2021-2022

Celta Vigo

2023-2024

Even when Benitez has found himself under pressure at clubs, he has enjoyed success, and he won the Europa League with Chelsea at a time when he was largely unpopular with the fanbase, due to his Reds past.

If Rangers could entice the 64-year-old to Ibrox this summer, it would be a major statement of intent, given the fact that he was once seen as one of Europe’s two most exciting upcoming managers, alongside Jose Mourinho in the early 2000s.

Rangers must sell Ibrox star who was "one of the best talents in Europe"

As Rangers prepare for a massive squad overhaul in the summer, they should sell a star Gerrard once said was “one of the best talents in Europe”.

ByBen Gray Apr 3, 2025

The £6m-a-year Benitez is a born winner with great tactical nous, and with all due respect to the popular Ferguson, he would be an undoubted upgrade overall.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus